The Art Of War Machiavelli Vs Sun Tzu
Hence it is a subject of inquiry which can on no account be neglected.
The art of war machiavelli vs sun tzu. Machiavelli s book the prince was concerned with governing as well as gaining the loyalty of his subjects by being an effective and compassionate leader. Sun tzu s art of war machiavelli s prince. Sun tzu also doesn t mention religion or mercenaries which are a big part of machiavelli. Sun tzu is good for just general strategy and machiavelli is strategy in late medieval italy.
Comparison between sun tzu s art of war and machiavelli s art of war essay. However napoleon s methods were sun tzu s not machiavelli s. The style is a little reminiscent of sun tzu s the art of war less staccato of course and with rather too many references to events contemporary to machiavelli which i have only dimly heard of if at all. It was known that napoleon carried a copy of l art de la guerre and it was assumed to be machiavelli s work because it was so much better known than sun tzu s at the time.
Sun tzu s art of war is one of the most read books that guide military strategists and leaders on issues that relate to war and how they should be approached. Citation needed the book has also become popular among political leaders and those in business management. My vote is for sun tzu because it can be applied to pretty much any situation 4 8k views. Sun tzu viewed the ideal general as an enlightened taoist master which has led to the art of war being considered a prime example of taoist strategy.
It is a matter of life and death a road either to safety or to ruin. Sun tzu s work was focused specifically on methods and theories that would lead to waging war successfully. In the art of war sun tzu stated that the art of war is of vital importance to the state. The 48 laws of power by robert greene paperback 14 99.
Sun tzu and machiavelli were the masters of leadership and their philosophies through their respective masterworks the art of war and the prince have taught generations of leaders the basics of being an effective leader and their philosophies still hold true today in today s cutthroat top tier corporate environment.